Jacques organised another dinner for the Chappaqua Wine Circle last night and this time the theme was California. It was probably the best yet even as we fretted while the Japanese stock market melted down. It goes without saying that these wines were awarded Parker points
Flight one: Chardonnay
Ceritas Porter Bass Chardonnay, 2007 (13.7% abv)
Crisp and clear colour, this has a super-sophisticated and exotic nose, but is leaner and more nuanced on the palate revealing the other side of its complex personality. Cool and crisp with a fine texture this has a kaleidoscope of flavors - pear drops, peaches, citrus, hazelnuts; minerals and slate. Complex, nuanced and lifted; exuberant but restrained at the same time, this did not have the power of the Aubert, but is perhaps the classiest new world chardonnay in the world. 97 points.
Aubert Ritchie Chardonnay 2008 (15.1% abv)
This was slightly cloudy because it is unfiltered in the Aubert mode. The nose was more closed than the Ceritas, but had faint hints of tropical fruits, which became sweeter and honeyed over the night. This is much thicker, more viscous and expansive and on the palate. It fills every crevice. It is a heavy weight not a middleweight like the Ceritas. But neither is it a hippo on ice…it is more like Muhammad Ali (whereas the Ceritas is Sugar Ray Leonard) …it is remarkably light on its feet and well balanced. It had an even longer finish than the Ceritas. Terrific stuff. 96 points
The Aubert won the flight five votes to two. I marginally preferred the Ceritas - much as I loved the Aubert - because I could sit down and watch a football game and drink the whole bottle, which would be more of a struggle with the Aubert.
Wines in the foreground, Stuart and Pierre in the background
Reds ready to go
Flight two:
Stag’s Leap Cask 23 1994
Sensational nose, which brought back memories of the extraordinary 1985 (with its ‘olfactory overload’)…really interesting notes of lead pencil and iodine – this was as close to Bordeaux as we were going to get all night. Drinking beautifully, we caught this one right at its apogee. 94 points
Silver Oak Cabernet 1994
A nose of pickles, dill and other herbs. Smoother, sweeter and more seductive on the palate than the Stag’s Leap, this was most popular around the table and overtly Californian. My only gripe would be the low acidity, but a very pleasurably wine and like its flight-mate right at its peak. 93 points
The table preferred the Silver Oak five votes to two
Flight three:
Pahlmeyer Proprietary Red, 1997
Purple at the rim, really delicious and slutty…it doesn’t pretend to be anything other than what it is. Wave upon wave of layered black and red fruits, with chocolate and vanilla notes folded in. It sends the pleasure-meter spinning wildly off the scale. A Californian Le Pin? 98 points
Philip Togni Cabernet 1994
Also purple and opaque…I adored the oxtail/cow’s arse nose. The palate is thick, dark and impenetrable - like a black hole. It shows little sign of evolution and I get plenty of squid ink – it’s that concentrated. It is opulent with earth and mineral nuances. This has a lot of power and complexity and requires a ton of patience – a behemoth! 96 points
The Pahlmeyer won five to two
Flight four
Peter Michael Les Pavots, 2005
Also light-suckingly opaque, with a purple rim. On the nose I get a lot of new American oak - lashings of it, but also some raspberry and dill herb nuances. On the palate it is smooth, silky, seamless and never ending. This wine surely pushes technological frontiers and clearly needs more time. 96 points
Shafer Hillside Select 2001
And so we saved the best to last. Put simply, this meets then exceeds all parameters for judging wine. It combines the hedonism of the Pahlmeyer with the structure of the Togni and is surely the benchmark for Californian cabernet. 99 points
The Shafer won six to one
Wine of the night (reds only)
Shafer – 15 points
Pahlmeyer – 10
Silver Oak – 6
Stag’s Leap – 4
Peter Michael - 3
Togni – 1
Thanks Jacques for another splendid evening.
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
Monday, 14 March 2011
Monday, 7 March 2011
Domaine De La Romanee Conti, La Tache, 1985 - wine of the decade (2001-10)
Looking back this was the wine of the decade. I drank this with Jono in April 2010 - who better to share it with than a young wine enthusiast on his 25th birthday? (A twenty five year old wine). First here is my note:
http://www.bordeauxwineenthusiasts.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1782&p=11828&hilit=la+tache#p11828
Then Jono's
http://www.wine-pages.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=025037#000000
Then Josie...btw she smelled it and had a sip. She did not drink it because she was only 12 at the time.
Josie wrote up my notes:
Halo?
Jono, Josie and Yours Truly
http://www.bordeauxwineenthusiasts.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1782&p=11828&hilit=la+tache#p11828
Then Jono's
http://www.wine-pages.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=025037#000000
Then Josie...btw she smelled it and had a sip. She did not drink it because she was only 12 at the time.
Josie wrote up my notes:
Halo?
Jono, Josie and Yours Truly
Saturday, 5 March 2011
A killer Batard
Could easily be my wine of the week...for just under $100 - just sublime, honey and of course a "fat ba(s)tard" on the palate - in the best possible sense:
Wine of the week
Castello Di Nieve Barbaresco Santo Stefano 2005
Just all that you could really ask for from a $40 barbaresco
Just all that you could really ask for from a $40 barbaresco
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
Haut Brion to Mouton and Margaux: I'm not your bitch
Last night Jacques (Chairman), Pierre (Vice Chairman) and Yours Truly had a Committe meeting at the (new and trendy) North restaurant in Armonk (as you will see soon we were the best looking dudes in the joint) to discuss the next Chappaqua Wine Club event - as it was my comeback night it got a bit competitive, silly even.
To start
Chateau Pape Clement Blanc 1996 – quiet a developed orange with initial sharp grapefruit it quickly puts on weight in the glass succulent Semillon notes lemongrass and lanolin, sumptuous and exotic on the palate with a hint of botrytis. Fully mature and went well with fois gras
Back in black (its good to be back)
Then together:
Chateau Haut Brion 1998 - scorched earth with front-loaded and somewhat abrasive tannins; camphor and peaty notes, authoritative, rich with ripe fruit, and wonderful meaty notes on the nose and the palate and a thick texture. It is evolving painfully slowly…a vin de garde and a beauty…but come back in five years.
Jacques: Haut-Brion sir?
Chateau Margaux 1996 had an intoxicating nose of blue berries and violets and was silky and diaphanous on the palate, with discreet and refined tannins; it even comes across as somewhat superficial and modern next to the others but there is a lot of power and substance behind this masterpice and at the end of the evening if shut down - as if came out to play just for our benefit.
Chateau Mouton Rothchild 1986 – soy, cassis, cedar, cigar box, a trade mark Mouton nose…on the palate it is thick and expansive with lots of exciting nuances including Asian spices, coffee and leather and meaty notes. This wine is still quite tightly wound up, but it is finally loosening up a bit after a quarter of a century and it is still on the upslope. It is characterized by its power and authority on the palate through to a long authoritative finish.
Then to finish
Chateau Yquem 2003 – I don’t think there is any such thing as a disappointing Yquem. The 2003 is arguably a great Yquem in the making. It is still young of course young but ready to go and full throttle. It has a heavenly nose and a thick unctuous and exotic palate. It is full-bodied, rich and powerful, but very complex and has perfect and lively balancing acidity and an incredible finish.
Three musketeers, four first growths
Concluding thoughts
I wouldn’t like to choose between the reds…clearly the Haut Brion was the least ready to drink but in no sense was it Margaux and Mouton’s bitch. In ten years it will be an incredible wine. The Mouton is still a wine that you admire more than enjoy, but the enjoyment factor increases every time. The Margaux was slick and a class act, a wine which for me won the Ch Margaux vertical a few years ago and which I described as the greatest young wine I ever tried in 2001. Very happy to own all of these.
To start
Chateau Pape Clement Blanc 1996 – quiet a developed orange with initial sharp grapefruit it quickly puts on weight in the glass succulent Semillon notes lemongrass and lanolin, sumptuous and exotic on the palate with a hint of botrytis. Fully mature and went well with fois gras
Back in black (its good to be back)
Then together:
Chateau Haut Brion 1998 - scorched earth with front-loaded and somewhat abrasive tannins; camphor and peaty notes, authoritative, rich with ripe fruit, and wonderful meaty notes on the nose and the palate and a thick texture. It is evolving painfully slowly…a vin de garde and a beauty…but come back in five years.
Jacques: Haut-Brion sir?
Chateau Margaux 1996 had an intoxicating nose of blue berries and violets and was silky and diaphanous on the palate, with discreet and refined tannins; it even comes across as somewhat superficial and modern next to the others but there is a lot of power and substance behind this masterpice and at the end of the evening if shut down - as if came out to play just for our benefit.
Chateau Mouton Rothchild 1986 – soy, cassis, cedar, cigar box, a trade mark Mouton nose…on the palate it is thick and expansive with lots of exciting nuances including Asian spices, coffee and leather and meaty notes. This wine is still quite tightly wound up, but it is finally loosening up a bit after a quarter of a century and it is still on the upslope. It is characterized by its power and authority on the palate through to a long authoritative finish.
Then to finish
Chateau Yquem 2003 – I don’t think there is any such thing as a disappointing Yquem. The 2003 is arguably a great Yquem in the making. It is still young of course young but ready to go and full throttle. It has a heavenly nose and a thick unctuous and exotic palate. It is full-bodied, rich and powerful, but very complex and has perfect and lively balancing acidity and an incredible finish.
Three musketeers, four first growths
Concluding thoughts
I wouldn’t like to choose between the reds…clearly the Haut Brion was the least ready to drink but in no sense was it Margaux and Mouton’s bitch. In ten years it will be an incredible wine. The Mouton is still a wine that you admire more than enjoy, but the enjoyment factor increases every time. The Margaux was slick and a class act, a wine which for me won the Ch Margaux vertical a few years ago and which I described as the greatest young wine I ever tried in 2001. Very happy to own all of these.
Tuesday, 1 March 2011
Mission accomplished
My fast has ended, or it will end in four hours from now, and I got through it successfully thanks to everyone who kindly agreed to sponsor me. I would not have lasted the distance otherwise and did not want to let the side down.
Many thanks to all of you and please follow up and make the donation. I will be donating the equivalent of $10 a day to various causes.
Yours sincerely,
Comte Flaneur de Boulevardier
Many thanks to all of you and please follow up and make the donation. I will be donating the equivalent of $10 a day to various causes.
Yours sincerely,
Comte Flaneur de Boulevardier
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













